A polynomial over a ring
2.5
is an expression of the form
Let's slow down and think about this for a second.
How is this expression for
rigorously defined?
For example, we could assume that
the possible values of
range over
, so the expression
is well-defined.
Unfortunately, if
were a finite field
(or finite ring) then the set of values of
,
for
, does not uniquely determine
the coefficients
of
.
(See Exercise 2.2.20 below.)
This is not what we
we want, since we want to say that two
polynomials are equal if and only if
the coefficients are all equal. Since we might be in
a situation where
is finite, we cannot
define a polynomial in terms of its values.
Instead, we simply assume that a polynomial
is a formal expression where
is a
``place-marker'' for its coefficients
.
A sequence
of elements of
will be called
finite if there are only finitely many non-zero
terms in the sequence. Let
denote the
set of all such finite sequences. Note that there
is a map
We define the addition and multiplication of two such formal polynomial expressions in the usual way 2.6: addition is ``coefficient-wise'',
This contrast and distinction of formal
expressions versus the idea of a polynomial being
an
-valued function is a moot point for
polynomials with coefficients in
or
(or in any infinite field,
for that matter), but it is important for polynomials
with coefficients in a finite
field because of the phenomenon illustrated in
the following example.
Let
be any field.
First, we observe that any finite set of points
in the ``plane''
may be ``interpolated'' using a
polynomial (which depends on these points and is of
of suitably high degree). The precise statement is the following result.
proof:
``By inspection.''
We will see that if
is a finite
field, every function
may
be written down as a polynomial with coefficients
in
using the Lagrange interpolation formula.
Let
have elements
and let
be any function. Let
be as in the Lagrange interpolation formula.
Then
for all
. In other words, over
a finite field, any function many be represented as a
polynomial function. Furthermore, this representation is
not unique.
This is why it is important not to assume that
``
'' is a ``variable with values in
'', as is commonly
done in calculus. It is better to think of the
powers
of a polynomial over a finite field
as ``placeholders'' for the coefficients
2.7.